Which Cut of Andrei Rublev Is Better? A Complete Guide
Want to know which cut of Andrei Rublev is better? The answer depends on what you’re looking for. The original cut (205 minutes) offers Tarkovsky’s full vision, while the theatrical cut (183 minutes) is shorter and easier to follow.
Both versions are brilliant, but choosing the right one can transform your experience. Let’s find out which cut suits you best!
Key Points
- The original cut (205 minutes) is Tarkovsky’s full artistic vision, untouched by censors.
- It’s ideal for viewers who enjoy slow, thoughtful, and detailed storytelling.
- The theatrical cut (183 minutes) is shorter and easier for newcomers to watch.
- It keeps the main story but trims scenes for a faster-paced experience.
- The original cut explores deeper themes of faith, doubt, and art.
- The theatrical cut focuses more on the main narrative and characters.
- Fans of Tarkovsky often consider the original cut the definitive version.
- Both cuts are masterpieces, offering unique ways to experience Andrei Rublev.
Which Cut of Andrei Rublev is Better?
The better version of Andrei Rublev depends on what you enjoy in a movie. The original cut is 205 minutes long and shows everything Tarkovsky wanted to include.
The theatrical cut is shorter at 183 minutes and easier to watch for many people. Fans of Tarkovsky’s work often say the original cut is the best because it is closer to his full vision.
Both versions are amazing, but each one offers a different experience.
The Original Andrei Rublev Cut (205 Minutes)
The original cut of Andrei Rublev is the version Andrei Tarkovsky wanted people to see. It’s 205 minutes long, so it includes everything he thought was important. This version goes deeper into ideas like faith, creativity, and the challenges of being human.
It’s detailed, emotional, and powerful, but it’s not for everyone.
Pros of the Original Andrei Rublev Cut
The original cut has a lot going for it. It feels complete and gives you the full experience Tarkovsky intended. Here’s why it stands out:
It’s Exactly How Tarkovsky Wanted It
This version shows everything Tarkovsky wanted to include. Nothing is missing or cut out. It’s like looking at a painting where every brushstroke is in place. Every scene matters and adds something to the story.
For example, you get to see more of Rublev’s struggles as an artist and a person. The extra scenes make his journey feel real. You understand his doubts and what drives him. It’s like getting the whole story instead of just part of it.
This cut also has scenes that were removed later because they were too controversial. These moments give the film more edge and make it stand out. If you want to experience Tarkovsky’s full vision, this is the version to watch.
It Moves Slowly But Beautifully
The pacing in this version is slow, but it’s not boring. Tarkovsky takes his time with every scene. He lets you really look at the world of the movie and feel what’s happening. It’s not about rushing to the next big moment. Instead, it’s about living in the story.
For example, there are scenes where nothing dramatic happens, but you can feel the emotions of the characters.
You might see a quiet moment of someone walking through a field, and it tells you so much about their inner struggles. These scenes make the film feel calm and reflective, like you’re thinking alongside the characters.
This slow pace gives you time to take everything in. You notice the beauty of the landscapes, the way people interact, and the quiet emotions behind their actions. It’s a different kind of storytelling, and it can be really moving.
It’s Rich With History and Emotion
This version gives you a deep look at life in medieval Russia. You see how hard life was back then and how people held onto their faith through tough times. The historical details make the world feel alive and believable.
Emotionally, the original cut goes deeper into Rublev’s thoughts and feelings. You see his fears, his doubts, and his growth. These moments make you feel like you really know him. The film doesn’t just show you what happened; it makes you feel the weight of his choices and struggles.
Cons of the Original Andrei Rublev Cut
As amazing as the original cut is, it’s not for everyone. Some people might find it hard to watch for a few reasons.
It’s Really Long
At over three hours, this version is a big commitment. You need a lot of time and focus to watch it. If you’re not used to long movies, it might feel like too much.
The length also means you can’t just watch it casually. You need to pay attention to everything, or you might miss important details. If you’re the kind of person who likes shorter, faster-paced films, this cut might feel like a drag.
It’s Very Artistic
Tarkovsky’s style is different from most movies. He uses long shots, quiet moments, and symbolic imagery. For some people, this feels beautiful and unique. For others, it can feel confusing or slow.
For example, some scenes don’t explain themselves clearly. You have to think about what they mean or why they’re there. This can feel frustrating if you’re not used to movies that make you work a little to understand them.
It’s Not Easy to Watch
The original cut isn’t very beginner-friendly. If you’ve never seen a Tarkovsky film, it might feel overwhelming. The long runtime and slow pace require a lot of patience. It’s not a movie you can just sit back and relax with.
That said, if you enjoy deep, thought-provoking films, this cut is an amazing experience. It’s not meant to be simple or easy. It’s meant to make you think and feel in ways most movies don’t. But if that’s not your thing, it’s okay. This version isn’t for everyone.
The Andrei Rublev Theatrical Cut (183 Minutes)
The theatrical cut of Andrei Rublev is shorter than the original, running 183 minutes. It was made to meet Soviet censorship demands. Some scenes were removed or changed, but the main story and themes are still there.
It’s easier to watch, especially for those new to Tarkovsky.
Pros of the Theatrical Cut
The theatrical cut has many strengths. It’s easier to follow, keeps the main themes, and is shorter, making it more approachable for most viewers. Let me explain.
The Story Feels Simpler and Clearer
This version focuses more on the main story. By cutting about 20 minutes, it moves at a quicker pace. You still follow Andrei Rublev’s journey, but it’s easier to understand without the slower or more abstract scenes.
For example, in the original, some scenes linger for a long time to build mood or show symbolism. Those moments are shortened here. This makes the film feel less overwhelming. If you don’t like movies with a lot of pauses or quiet moments, this cut might feel just right.
The simplified storytelling doesn’t take away from the big ideas. You still see Rublev’s struggles as an artist. The themes of faith, doubt, and creativity remain strong. But it feels more like a straightforward story, which is great for viewers who don’t want something too complex.
Keeps the Core Themes
Even though it’s shorter, this version doesn’t lose the heart of the film. Tarkovsky’s ideas about art and faith are still there. You’ll still see Rublev question his purpose as an artist and deal with the world’s hardships.
The visuals and emotions remain powerful too. For example, there’s a scene where Rublev struggles to finish a bell for a church. It’s a symbol of human effort and creativity. Even in this shorter version, that moment feels just as meaningful.
This cut keeps the deep questions intact. It asks things like, “Why do we create art?” and “How can faith survive in tough times?” These themes are universal, and the cuts do not weaken them.
Shorter Length Makes It More Accessible
The shorter runtime makes the film feel less intimidating. At 183 minutes, it’s still long, but it’s easier to manage than the 205-minute original. If you’re watching Tarkovsky for the first time, this version is a good starting point.
You can enjoy the story without committing to a full three-and-a-half hours. The shorter length also helps if you’re not used to slow-paced films. You still get the beauty and depth of Tarkovsky’s work, but in a way that’s easier to watch.
Cons of the Theatrical Cut
While the theatrical cut has its strengths, it also has some downsides. The changes made for censorship and the shorter runtime mean it’s not as rich or complete as the original.
Some of Tarkovsky’s Vision Is Missing
This version isn’t exactly what Tarkovsky wanted. Some scenes were removed to satisfy Soviet censors. These cuts affected parts of the story that were more philosophical or controversial.
For example, the original cut dives deeply into Rublev’s doubts and struggles. It shows his inner journey in more detail. In this version, some of those moments are shorter or missing. That means you don’t get the full picture of who Rublev is and what he’s going through.
Fans of Tarkovsky often say this version feels like a compromise. While it’s still a great film, it’s not as personal or ambitious as the original.
Loses Some Depth
The shorter runtime means there’s less room for the rich details that make the original so powerful. Certain scenes feel rushed, and some characters don’t get as much attention. This can make the world of the film feel less immersive.
For instance, the original spends more time showing the struggles of medieval life. You feel the harshness of the world Rublev lives in. In this version, those details are toned down. While the main story is still there, it doesn’t feel as deep or emotional.
Rublev’s growth as a person also feels less complete. The original shows more of his doubts and his eventual transformation. In the theatrical cut, these changes are still present, but they’re not as powerful. You lose some of the emotional weight that makes the original so moving.
Which Cut of Andrei Rublev Should You Watch?
Picking the right cut of Andrei Rublev depends on what kind of viewer you are and how much time you have. Both versions are amazing, but they feel different, so it’s about what works best for you. Let me break it down.
The Original Cut: For True Film Lovers
If you’re really into movies and love deep, meaningful stories, the original cut (205 minutes) is probably the one for you. This version is exactly what Tarkovsky wanted. It’s his full vision without any changes or cuts.
Watching it feels like stepping into a painting – slow, beautiful, and packed with details.
The original cut lets you see everything: Rublev’s doubts, his fears, and how he grows as an artist. You also get a better sense of what life was like in medieval Russia. It’s not just a movie – it’s an experience.
Tarkovsky takes his time, so you can really feel the story.
But, let’s be real. It’s long – more than three hours. That’s a lot of time to spend on one movie. If you’re okay with that and love exploring deep ideas about life, art, and faith, this cut is worth it. But you’ll need patience.
The Theatrical Cut: For First-Timers
If you’ve never seen a Tarkovsky movie, or if three hours feels like too much, the theatrical cut (183 minutes) is a great choice. It’s shorter and easier to sit through. The story is still amazing, and the main themes about art, faith, and struggle are all there.
This version focuses more on the main story. It moves quicker and doesn’t spend as much time on the smaller details. That makes it easier to watch, especially if you’re new to Tarkovsky’s style. You still get the stunning visuals and Rublev’s journey, but it feels less overwhelming.
However, because some scenes are cut, it’s not as rich or detailed as the original. You miss some of the deeper emotions and ideas that make the longer version so powerful. But for a first watch, it’s a great way to get to know Tarkovsky without diving in too deep.
So, Which One Should You Watch?
If you’re someone who loves slow, thoughtful films and don’t mind spending a lot of time on one movie, go with the original cut. It’s the full story and gives you the complete experience Tarkovsky wanted you to have.
But if you’re new to Tarkovsky, or if you want something that’s easier to handle, start with the theatrical cut. It’s shorter, easier to follow, and still an incredible film.
At the end of the day, you can’t go wrong with either version. Both are masterpieces in their own way. It’s just about what works best for you – whether you want the full journey or a shorter introduction.
If you admire Andrei Rublev, you’ll find Like Father Like Son just as moving. Here’s why the Like Father Like Son film is worth watching.
Andrei Rublev Durochka: Everything About Her
Durochka is one of the most unforgettable characters in Andrei Rublev. Her name means “the Fool,” but she’s so much more than that.
She’s a young woman who doesn’t speak much and seems simple or naive. People around her often treat her as if she doesn’t matter, but her presence carries a quiet power.
Durochka represents innocence in a world that’s harsh and unforgiving. She doesn’t fight or argue, and she doesn’t fit in with the chaos around her.
One of the most heartbreaking moments is when she leaves with a Tatar raider. You’re not sure if she chooses to go or if she’s forced. Either way, it’s a scene that stays with you and makes you think about her life and what might happen to her.
She doesn’t say much, but her actions speak volumes. She’s a symbol of purity and vulnerability, and she adds so much emotion to the story.
Durochka’s role reminds us that even in the darkest times, there’s still a fragile kind of beauty in people like her. Her story might be small, but it leaves a big impact.
Want to Know About Andrei Rublev’s Horse?
The horse in Andrei Rublev is much more than just an animal in the background. Tarkovsky uses horses to show both the beauty and cruelty of life. The horses feel alive in the film, and they’re part of the world’s story just like the people are.
One of the most unforgettable scenes is when a horse falls down a staircase. It’s hard to watch because it feels so real and brutal.
Tarkovsky included moments like this to show how harsh life was in medieval times. The horses are caught in the same violence and struggles as the people. They aren’t protected from the chaos, which makes their presence even more powerful.
But the horses also have moments of grace. In some scenes, they’re calm and free, almost like they’re symbols of hope. In others, they’re trapped and frightened, reminding us how fragile life can be. This balance makes the horses in Andrei Rublev feel symbolic of humanity’s struggles.
Tarkovsky paid attention to every detail in his films, and the horses are no exception. They add so much realism and emotion to the story. They aren’t just props; they’re part of the film’s soul.
Interested in meaningful cinema? Discover how 12 Years a Slave movie handles its toughest moments and why they matter.
What Is the Andrei Rublev Criterion?
The Andrei Rublev Criterion is a special edition of the movie released by The Criterion Collection. If you’ve heard of Criterion before, you know they’re known for restoring old films and making them look and sound their best.
For Andrei Rublev, they’ve done an amazing job.
This edition includes both the original 205-minute cut and the shorter 183-minute theatrical cut. It gives you the choice to watch whichever version you want.
Tarkovsky’s work is famous for its stunning visuals, like breathtaking landscapes and the use of light and shadows. Criterion’s restoration makes everything sharp, clear, and as beautiful as possible.
But the best part isn’t just the movie. Criterion adds extras like interviews, documentaries, and essays about the film. These help you understand Tarkovsky’s vision and the historical background of Andrei Rublev. They give you more context about why this movie is so important.
If you’re a fan of Andrei Rublev or you want to understand why it’s considered a masterpiece, the Criterion edition is the one to watch. It’s the ultimate way to experience Tarkovsky’s work and get a deeper appreciation of this incredible film.
Andrei Rublev Explained
Andrei Rublev is a movie by Andrei Tarkovsky, and it’s considered a masterpiece. It tells the story of a medieval Russian painter, Andrei Rublev, and the challenges he faces in his life.
Here’s its trailer:
The film isn’t just about his art. Nope. It’s about his faith, his struggles, and how he finds purpose in a world filled with violence and hardship.
The Start: Life in a Harsh World
The movie begins by showing how difficult life was in 15th-century Russia. Rublev and two other monks are traveling together, offering their art to churches. They see war, suffering, and betrayal everywhere they go.
These early parts of the film are slow but important. They show Rublev’s quiet personality and how he observes the world around him. He starts questioning if art can truly mean anything in such a cruel world.
The Middle: Losing Faith
In the middle of the story, Rublev faces many events that challenge his beliefs. He sees people hurt each other during a Tatar invasion.
He even kills a man himself, which fills him with guilt. He decides to stop painting and takes a vow of silence. This part of the film is very emotional, as you see Rublev struggling to understand the purpose of his life and his art.
The Ending: Finding Hope
The final part of the movie brings hope. Rublev meets a young boy who builds a giant church bell without knowing if it will work. The boy’s courage and determination inspire Rublev. He sees that faith and creativity can survive, even in the darkest times.
Rublev breaks his silence and decides to paint again. The film ends with a sense of renewal, showing that art and faith can bring meaning to life.
Does Andrei Rublev Have an Intermission?
Yes, the original 205-minute version of Andrei Rublev includes an intermission. It comes right in the middle of the movie and acts as a natural break. Since the film is very long and full of deep themes, this pause gives you time to process what you’ve seen so far.
The intermission usually happens after the chapters where Rublev begins to lose his faith. It marks a shift from the film’s earlier, more observational tone to the heavier, more emotional moments in the second half.
If you’re watching this version, the break is a perfect time to gather your thoughts or take a short pause.
In the 183-minute theatrical cut, there’s usually no intermission. This version moves at a slightly faster pace, but because of its length, you might still want to take a short break on your own. Whether or not you see the intermission depends on the version and how you’re watching it.
Is the Andrei Rublev Soundtrack Good?
The soundtrack of Andrei Rublev is simple but powerful. It was composed by Vyacheslav Ovchinnikov and fits perfectly with the mood of the movie. The music uses soft, traditional sounds, like choral singing and medieval instruments, to create a timeless feeling.
The music doesn’t overpower the story. Instead, it blends with the film’s atmosphere. In quiet scenes, the soundtrack is subtle or even silent, letting the natural sounds of the world, like wind or water, take over. In more intense moments, the music rises and adds to the emotion.
What makes the soundtrack so special is how well it matches the story’s ups and downs. It’s haunting and beautiful, much like the film itself.
If you enjoy music that makes you feel something deep, you’ll probably love this soundtrack. It stays with you long after the movie ends.
Where to Watch Andrei Rublev Videos?
You can watch Andrei Rublev on several platforms. It’s available on the Criterion Channel, which is known for restoring classic films. You can also rent or buy it on Amazon Prime, iTunes, or other streaming services.
If you prefer a physical copy, look for the Criterion Collection Blu-ray or DVD.
Another option is checking your local library. Many libraries have DVDs of classic films like Andrei Rublev. If you want to stream it for free, look at platforms like Kanopy, which some libraries offer.
Just make sure to watch it in good quality, because Tarkovsky’s visuals are stunning. The movie is best enjoyed on a screen that shows all the details clearly.
Wherever you choose to watch, this film is worth finding. It’s a unique and unforgettable experience.
Conclusion
In summary:
- Watch the original cut if you want the full experience Tarkovsky intended.
- Choose the theatrical cut for a shorter, more accessible version.
- Both cuts explore themes of faith, creativity, and humanity.
- The original offers more detail, while the theatrical cut is faster-paced.
- No matter which you choose, Andrei Rublev is a cinematic treasure.
Whichever cut you pick, you’re in for a stunning journey through Tarkovsky’s genius. Enjoy the film!